hartford connecticut criminal defense attorney
Design defects will also come into play in the investigations of faulty products. Under these conditions, no matter how poorly or well manufactured an item was made, if it was inherently designed with defects there is no blaming the manufacturer for the adverse conditions that resulted. When a product fails to meet standard expectations of safety consistent among consumers of all types, it could be classified as defective in its design. The same is true for products in which the risks outweigh the benefits of using the item.
Product liability cases can also be made on claims of failure to warn. Under these circumstances, a product may carry with it nonobvious dangers that are inherent in its overall being - completely separate from its design and manufacture. Under these circumstances, the underlying issue lies in the fact that a product's dangers could have been alleviated if the item had donned the proper warnings on its label. No matter how well a product is designed and manufactured, there certain situations that require adequate warnings to the potential users of the product, and when these warnings do not exist there could be serious cause for concern. In these cases, a product liability claim will almost certainly be in order.
As an individual pursues a product liability claim, whether through manufacturing defects, design defects, or breach of warranty it will be essential that negligence is proven. To do so, it must be shown that a duty was owed; the duty was breached in some way or another; the breach in some way caused harm or personal injury to the plaintiff; the breach proximately caused injury to the plaintiff; and quantifiable injuries were sustained as a result of the breach. When all of these can be determined and successfully proven, a plaintiff will be met with the positive results desired in their product liability claim.
On September 11, 2011, we, as a country commemorated the ten-year anniversary of the terrorist attacks by extremists that killed thousands of innocent people, most U.S. citizens. As we know, these attacks have, with certainty, not only impacted our lives but changed many of our day-to-day routines. From a security/law enforcement perspective the changes have been as dramatic. As police chiefs, we became extremely cognizant of the importance of networking and information sharing on a new and totally different level. In addition to exchanging information regarding the day-to-day crime that affected our communities such as the distribution and selling illegal drugs, gang related activities, stolen car rings, or cross jurisdictional robbery sprees, the focus now included intelligence sharing of potential terrorist activities. After all, this was one of the Six-point Agenda items developed and announced by US Department of Homeland Security Secretary Chertoff in July 2005.